"Jesus consistently treated the miracle accounts of the Old Testament as straightforward, truthful, historical accounts (e.g., creation of Adam, Noah and the Flood, Lot and his wife in Sodom, Moses and the manna, and Jonah in the fish). He continually affirmed the authority of Scripture over men’s ideas and traditions (Matthew 15:1–9). In Mark 10:6 we have the clearest (but not the only) statement showing that Jesus was a young-earth creationist. He teaches that Adam and Eve were made at the 'beginning of creation,' not billions of years after the beginning, as would be the case if the universe were really billions of years old. So, if Jesus was a young-earth creationist, then how can His faithful followers have any other view?" —Dr. Timothy Mortenson, Why Shouldn’t Christians Accept Millions of Years? (1)
This claim, frequently promoted by Answers in Genesis and similar pro-YEC sources, may initially seem convincing. If Jesus treated Genesis as literal history, wouldn’t that mean he supported a Young Earth perspective? However, a deeper examination reveals significant issues with this assertion.
Understanding Young Earth Creationism
Modern Young Earth Creationism (YEC) is a relatively recent movement, gaining widespread traction in the 1960s. While it emphasizes a young universe—approximately 6,000 to 7,000 years old—it also incorporates several additional doctrinal positions, including but not limited to:
A strict, literal interpretation of Scripture, emphasizing a plain reading of Genesis.
A six-day creation week consisting of 24-hour days.
An originally flawless creation—free from pain, sickness, death and entropy. (2)
A world where all animals were originally herbivores, with no predation.
A catastrophic global flood shaping most geological formations and fossil deposits.
The existence of an advanced antediluvian civilization, possessing at least iron-age technology—or potentially technology comparable to our own—that was ultimately destroyed by the Flood. (3, 4)
The coexistence of humans and dinosaurs well into recorded history. (5, 6)
A water vapor or ice canopy (raqia [רָקִיעַ]) positioned above the atmosphere or at the edge of the universe. (7)
Given these doctrinal positions, the claim that Jesus adhered to modern YEC ideology requires careful scrutiny.
How Often Did Jesus Reference Genesis?
One common assertion supporting the idea that Jesus was a YEC is that he quoted Genesis more than any other book. However, Jesus directly quoted Genesis only once—Matthew 19:4-6 (and its parallel in Mark 10:6-7):
"Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate."
While Jesus referenced Genesis indirectly 18 times throughout the Gospels, these make up only about 7% of his total Old Testament references. In contrast, Psalms was quoted 11 times, Deuteronomy 10 times, Isaiah 8 times, and Exodus 7 times—contradicting the claim that Genesis was Jesus’ most-referenced book.
Addressing the Claim: Biblical Authority and the Age of the Earth
Some proponents of Young Earth Creationism (YEC) argue that Jesus affirmed a young earth in passages such as Luke 16:29-31 and John 3:12, 5:46-47. However, a closer examination of these texts reveals that they do not address the age of the earth or endorse modern YEC doctrine.
Luke 16:29-31: Affirming the Authority of Scripture
In Luke 16:29-31, Jesus recounts the parable of the rich man and Lazarus. The rich man, suffering in Hades, pleads with Abraham to send Lazarus to warn his brothers. Abraham responds:
"They have Moses and the prophets; they should listen to them."
"'No, father Abraham,’ he said. ‘But if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.'"
"But he told him, 'If they don’t listen to Moses and the prophets, they will not be persuaded if someone rises from the dead.'"
This passage emphasizes the sufficiency of Scripture for guiding people to repentance. It does not address creation, the age of the earth, or scientific interpretations of Genesis. The reference to "Moses and the prophets" affirms the authority of the Old Testament, but it does not specify how one should interpret Genesis 1.
John 5:46-47: Jesus and Moses
In John 5:46-47, Jesus says:
"For if you believed Moses, you would believe me, because he wrote about me. But if you don’t believe what he wrote, how will you believe my words?"
Here, Jesus affirms that Moses wrote about him, reinforcing the continuity between the Old Testament and his own teachings. However, this statement does not indicate that Jesus endorsed a specific interpretation of Genesis. Instead, he highlights the importance of believing Moses' writings in a theological sense—particularly regarding the coming of the Messiah.
John 3:12: Earthly and Heavenly Truths
In John 3:12, Jesus says:
"If I have told you about earthly things and you don’t believe, how will you believe if I tell you about heavenly things?"
This verse highlights the distinction between earthly and heavenly truths. Jesus is speaking to Nicodemus, emphasizing that if people struggle to accept foundational spiritual truths, they will find it even harder to grasp deeper, heavenly realities. Some YEC proponents might argue that "earthly things" refer to a literal interpretation of Genesis, including a young earth. However, the context of John 3:12 suggests that Jesus is addressing faith and understanding with regards to salvation rather than making a statement about the age of the earth or modern scientific knowledge.
Much like Luke 16:29-31 and John 5:46-47, John 3:12 reinforces the importance of belief and spiritual comprehension rather than endorsing a specific interpretation of Genesis. Jesus is urging Nicodemus—and by extension, all believers—to trust in his teachings, which extend beyond physical realities into profound spiritual truths.
The Importance of Proper Biblical Interpretation
As Dr. John H. Walton notes in The Lost World of the Israelite Conquest:
"If we want to reach an understanding about how we should go about reading a particular passage in the Bible, we have to understand how we should go about reading the Bible more generally. In particular, we want to have a way to approach the biblical text that we are comfortable applying to any part of it, as opposed to selectively choosing an approach based on whether it produces the conclusions that we want."
Applying this principle, we must recognize that questioning an interpretation of Scripture is not the same as rejecting Scripture itself. In fact, rejecting incorrect interpretations demonstrates discernment and respect for God's Word. Luke 16:29-31 and John 5:46-47 affirm the authority of Scripture, but they do not provide evidence that Jesus was a Young Earth Creationist.
Context Matters: What Was Jesus Actually Saying?
Jesus' reference to Genesis in Matthew 19 is not about cosmology, creation timelines, dinosaurs, or flood geology—it’s about marriage and divorce. He draws on Genesis to affirm gender and the sanctity of marriage, not to establish a scientific framework for the age of the earth. Consider that the Hebrew title for the first book of the Bible, Bereshit (בְּרֵאשִׁ֖ית), literally means "in the beginning." This nuance suggests that when Jesus uses the term "the beginning" in Matthew 19, he may not be referring to a specific moment in time but rather alluding to the book of Genesis itself. In doing so, he emphasizes its theological significance and its relevance to the discussion on marriage and divorce.
The idea that Jesus endorsed modern Young Earth Creationism requires reading contemporary debates into ancient texts. Instead, his teachings emphasize Scripture’s theological and moral implications rather than detailed scientific claims.
Conclusion
While Jesus acknowledged Genesis and referenced it for theological purposes, the claim that he was a Young Earth Creationist in the modern sense is an oversimplification. He did not address scientific interpretations of creation, nor did he promote the core doctrines of contemporary YECism. Instead, his teachings focused on the authority of Scripture, the nature of God’s creation, and the importance of faithfulness in relationships.
Ultimately, Christians should approach such claims with discernment, ensuring that theological perspectives are grounded in sound interpretation rather than modern projections onto ancient texts.
No comments:
Post a Comment